Which element is NOT typically associated with role involvement in a cohesive group environment?

Role consistency is not typically associated with role involvement in a cohesive group environment in the way that the other elements are. In a cohesive group, members often have defined roles that align with their strengths and goals, and they participate actively to enhance group dynamics and performance.

Role satisfaction reflects how fulfilled individuals feel in their roles, which contributes positively to group cohesion and individual motivation. Role conflict can arise when there are misunderstandings or discrepancies in role expectations among group members, impacting the overall group dynamics and individual involvement. Role efficacy pertains to individuals' belief in their capability to perform their roles effectively, which can also contribute to a cohesive environment by fostering confidence and competence within the group.

In contrast, role consistency refers specifically to the degree to which an individual’s behavior aligns with their defined role over time. While maintaining consistency in roles can be valuable, it does not inherently drive the level of involvement or the cohesiveness of the group dynamically as the other elements mentioned. Thus, its absence or presence doesn't have the same direct impact on the cohesion of the environment.