Which of the following approaches describes how feedback is structured to enhance learning?

The Positive Sandwich Approach is a well-recognized method in sports psychology and learning processes that emphasizes structuring feedback in a way that fosters a positive learning environment. This approach typically involves giving constructive criticism between two positive comments, effectively "sandwiching" the critique. The rationale behind this technique is that starting and ending with positive reinforcement can make the individual more receptive to the critique provided in the middle.

By beginning with something the athlete or learner did well, the sender of the message helps to build the learner's confidence and encourages motivation. The constructive feedback, delivered afterward, aims to highlight areas that need improvement while being presented in a supportive manner. Finally, concluding with another positive remark reinforces the learner’s strengths and leaves them feeling encouraged. This structure is beneficial not only for enhancing learning but also for maintaining the athlete's self-esteem and motivation to progress.

In contrast, the other approaches, such as the Authoritarian Approach, might involve a more rigid and sometimes negative feedback method that focuses on compliance rather than encouragement. The Passive Coaching Style may lack engagement and can lead to a lack of progression in skill development. The Peer Feedback Model relies on feedback from fellow peers rather than a coach or instructor, which may not provide the structured guidance needed for effective learning.